Guidelines for the Use of Field 856
No single subfield is required in all cases. Which ones are used largely depends on the access method indicated in the first indicator or in $2 (if first indicator=7).
In several of the situations below for which specific subfields are given, subfield $u (Uniform Resource Locator) may be used instead of a group of specific subfields.
If 1st indicator = 0 (email), the following subfields are used:
Those not listed can theoretically be used but no examples have been identified.
This is equivalent to URL mailto: scheme.
If 1st indicator = 1 (ftp), the following subfields are used:
Those not listed can theoretically be used but no examples have been identified.
This is equivalent to URL ftp: scheme.
If 1st indicator = 2 (Remote login), the following subfield is used:
Those not listed can theoretically be used but no examples have been identified.
This is equivalent to URL telnet: scheme.
If 1st indicator = 7 (Method specified in subfield $2):
Any subfields may be used depending on the access method. This approach may be used for a variety of circumstances. The following access methods that do not have a specific indicator value may be indicated in subfield $2:
Use of Uniform Resource Locator
For any of the above, a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) can be used in subfield $u instead of parsing the data into separate subfields. A URL may also be used in addition to the separate subfields, if it is desirable to display data in a particular way; it is unlikely that LC will do this. If a URL is used instead of separate subfields, it is unlikely that other subfields will be used except in some circumstances $n (Name of location of host) and/or $3 (Materials specified; indicates a subset of the bibliographic item that is available electronically).
At LC, all subfields defined as of February 1994 have been validated across formats. Field 856 has been used at LC as follows:
World Wide Web linkage: Bibliographic records are being linked to electronic files accessible through LC's WWW server. Some of these are items that have a table of contents outside of the bibliographic record available electronically. Others may be computer file records for items available electronically (through WWW). It is expected that this use will be extended to other electronic resources that need to be linked to MARC records. These typically include the following subfields:
The following changes were approved by the USMARC Advisory Group at its American Library Association meetings in February 1995 and June 1994. They will be incorporated into Update No. 1 to the USMARC Format for Bibliographic Data in the near future.
Attachment A is an updated version of field 856 including June 1994 and February 1995 changes.
Attachment B shows LC examples.
Table of Contents | Index to this Section | Next page |
Rev. 12/13/95 dih