%PDF-1.4
%
2078 0 obj
<>/Metadata 2074 0 R/OpenAction 2079 0 R/Outlines 2145 0 R/OutputIntents[<>]/PageLayout/SinglePage/PageMode/UseOutlines/Pages 2067 0 R/StructTreeRoot 152 0 R/Type/Catalog/ViewerPreferences<>>>
endobj
2074 0 obj
<>stream
Microsoft® Word 2010
Oil palm; rubber; non-farm households; labor markets; sharecropping; income
Microsoft® Word 2010
2018-01-08T13:00:32+01:00
2018-01-11T09:55:04+01:00
2018-01-11T09:55:04+01:00
uuid:F607D090-1EAA-421B-9DEF-128CD1A48259
uuid:25299017-7aba-4709-8489-e9dffd35273c
1
A
True
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
application/pdf
Bou Dib
J.
Krishna
V.
Alamsyah
Z
Qaim
M.
Land-use change and livelihoods of non-farm households: The role of income from employment in oil palm and rubber in rural Indonesia
Many tropical regions are experiencing massive land-use change that is often characterized by an expansion of oil palm at the expense of forests and more traditional forms of agricultural cropping. While implications of such land-use change for the environment and for local farm households were examined in previous research, possible effects on the livelihoods of non-farm households are not yet well understood. This study analyzes the role of different types of agricultural and non-agricultural employment income for non-farm households in rural Jambi, one of the hotspot regions of Indonesia’s recent oil palm boom. Data from a recent survey show that employment in rubber and oil palm are important livelihood components for non-farm households. Employment in oil palm is more lucrative than employment in rubber, so involvement in the oil palm sector as a laborer is positively associated with total household income. Regression models show that whether or not a household works in oil palm is largely determined by factors related to migration background, ethnicity, and the size of the village area grown with this crop. These results suggest that further expansion of the oil palm area will likely benefit non-farm households through gains in employment income. As non-farm households belong to the poorest segments of the rural population, these benefits should not be ignored when designing policies towards sustainable land use
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Oil palm
rubber
non-farm households
labor markets
sharecropping
income
endstream
endobj
2079 0 obj
<>
endobj
2145 0 obj
<>
endobj
2067 0 obj
<>
endobj
152 0 obj
<>
endobj
153 0 obj
<>
endobj
154 0 obj
<>
endobj
155 0 obj
<>1980 0 R]/P 159 0 R/Pg 19 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
156 0 obj
<>1979 0 R]/P 159 0 R/Pg 19 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
157 0 obj
<>1978 0 R]/P 159 0 R/Pg 19 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
158 0 obj
<>1977 0 R]/P 159 0 R/Pg 19 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
2319 0 obj
<>2276 0 R]/P 2323 0 R/Pg 2322 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
2320 0 obj
<>2281 0 R 2325 0 R 2282 0 R 2326 0 R 2283 0 R]/P 2327 0 R/Pg 2322 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
2327 0 obj
<>
endobj
2322 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>>>/StructParents 40/Type/Page>>
endobj
2329 0 obj
<>stream
xKo6x\X p)mAv
$G{eY#qdW~~Rϟ{2/^_?ՠ}PvNrr yOyJ)8*lVU^%:Fu<>W~WAȎ.D60d
4v%Knq3
>(.{H(P+ز`Ae]e%VY_ fX:?f8I,;&d4$/L\= 1JYXPZVYXmsKmXT(,{@o%{F$m;;=wZݬlRjи<5YҊ^@ANujluc5DgbpV^t}0q.[ȧ|bl|uFh1"
gKe̎fH-ZH`%4:;N-[Q g4G>h
2 F,$\r&{35
Id{
el KieviW ]`J)F7tj)pXϼ9<jXͰv>O5x{zKo/8Ttd(͍irL:B(ƗT3BkvjrDo5t;ϴXLXZ`%KA*sy9֊5.P2O EGr-%=piPw'I~?tYZrb4,h,cB-G".LMhΝ95%Y2Gc*h9c!,r' *YF%y,*G4V~]ȝ$lp_;9/6l.hgŎ^,E_pӂ=-Izx*[F'bK=ȢZ,XYԢ1ƑZEܷzl×a`IC5ԕqX:8$^`
.QK&ɳ呖1ӺMԏ[gTԌgTaj (2p!&MGt͜u,j#Hy:q %*4nEmE1SE]#tТ kQ>XTx