-
-
- The Nixon doctrine and smaller budgets drove Secretary of Defense Melvin
R. Laird to set an Army goal of 21 divisions, 13 in the Regular Army and
8 in the National Guard, by 1973. Structured and equipped primarily to defend
Western Europe, the divisions were designed for conventional warfare against
the Soviet Union's heavy armor forces. To complement the divisions, the
Army maintained 21 separate combined arms brigades, 18 in the Army National
Guard and 3 in the Army Reserve. In addition, the Regular Army continued
to employ special mission brigades as theater defense forces.2
-
- In October 1969 the Army Staff suspended all new work on revised tables
of organization and equipment for armored, infantry, and mechanized infantry
divisions because the proposed changes required too many men to field them.
Instead, it directed the Combat Developments Command to develop divisions
of fewer than
- [353]
- TOW (tutee-launched, optically tracked, wire-guided) missile
-
- 17,000 men. The project, entitled AIM (armored, infantry, and mechanized
infantry divisions), would occupy Army planners' attention for the next
several years and focus primarily on the European battlefield.3
-
- In their final form the new AIM tables neither altered the overall ROAD
doctrine nor radically modified divisional structures but addressed ways
to counter various types of Soviet threats. To defend against low-altitude
hostile aircraft and surface targets, the tables provided each division
with an air defense artillery battalion equipped with Chaparral missiles
and Vulcan guns, weapons that had been under development since 1964. The
new battalion gave divisions the first dedicated antiaircraft artillery
unit since pentomic reorganization. Aviation companies reappeared in mechanized
infantry and armored divisions to enhance air support. In the divisional
support command, adjutant general and finance companies replaced the administration
company to improve personnel services, and automatic data processing equipment
was added to provide centralized control of personnel and logistics. Eventually
automatic data processing led to the introduction of a materiel (supply
and maintenance) management center in each division.4
-
- In infantry, mechanized infantry, and armor battalions, the tables concentrated
combat support (scouts, mortars, air defense and antitank weapons, ground
surveillance equipment, and maintenance resources) into a combat support
company. Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided missiles (TOWS) replaced
ENTACs and 106-mm. recoilless rifles as antitank weapons in the infantry
and mechanized infantry battalions. Since the TOW was only just emerging
from its developmental stage, the tables approved the retention of the 106-mm.
recoilless rifle as a temporary measures.5
-
- Modernization of armored, infantry, and mechanized infantry divisions
became an ongoing process primarily to due to shortages of equipment. Because
of the need for antiaircraft weapons in the divisional area, the Air Defense
Artillery School at Fort Bliss, Texas, inaugurated a program in the spring
of 1969 to activate and train Chaparral-Vulcan battalions, which were assigned
to divisions upon completion of training. After the new divisional tables
were published in
- [354]
- 1970, the Honest John rocket battalions were eliminated as divisional units,
and new Lance missile units replaced them at corps level. The adjutant general
and finance companies were introduced in 1971, the aviation companies returned
in 1972, the materiel management center appeared in 1973, and new combat intelligence
companies were assigned beginning in 1974 (replacing the combat intelligence
unit, which had been regularly attached to every division since the pentomic
reorganization of 1957). The company provided a battlefield information coordination
center to plan and manage the collection of intelligence and consolidated
ground surveillance radar and remote sensors under one commander.6
-
- The standard maneuver element mix of the mechanized infantry division
was also adjusted for the European battlefield. An additional armor battalion
was added to the model division, making the mix five armor and six mechanized
infantry battalions. Subsequently the Army activated additional armor battalions
for the 3d and 8th Infantry Divisions stationed in Germany in 1972. That
same year the Continental Army Command replaced a mechanized infantry battalion
with an armor battalion in the 4th Infantry Division at Fort Carson, Colorado,
and in 1973 made a similar change, giving the division a maneuver element
mix of four armor and six infantry battalions. In the armored division the
maneuver mix remained at five mechanized infantry and six armor battalions.
Infantry divisions fielded one armor, one mechanized infantry, and eight
"foot" infantry battalions.7
-
- To have thirteen Regular Army divisions, the Army Staff directed the 25th
Infantry Division, which fielded only one brigade after leaving Vietnam,
to be reorganized at Schofield Barracks in the spring of 1972. Because of
environmental issues surrounding the use of Schofield Barracks at that time,
the division had only two brigades (six infantry battalions), with the Hawaii
Army National Guard agreeing to "round out" the 25th with the
29th Infantry Brigade. Since the brigade included the 100th Battalion, 442d
Infantry, from the Army Reserve, the division was truly representative of
the "Total Army."8
-
- For the thirteenth Regular Army division in the force, the Continental
Army Command reactivated the 9th Infantry Division at Fort Lewis on 21 April
1972. Over the next few months the division organized one armor, one mechanized
infantry, and seven infantry battalions, which was one less infantry unit
than the standard for an infantry division. The division base had all its
authorized elements except for the Honest John battalion, then under consideration
for elimination in all divisions. Two years later the Army Staff directed
the 9th to establish one brigade as an armored unit to support contingency
plans, and when it became evident that the active Army was unable to field
an additional tank battalion, the Washington Army National Guard agreed
to furnish a tank battalion as a round-out unit.9
-
- While organizing the thirteen-division force, the Continental Army Command
determined that the 197th Infantry Brigade, assigned to the Infantry School
at Fort Benning, Georgia, was overmanned for its training support mission
in the post-Vietnam Army. To provide personnel needed for the school, the
command directed that the school support troops be reorganized and the 197th
be
- [355]
- restructured as a unit in the Strategic Army Force. On 21 March 1973 the
brigade officially joined the strategic force, fielding one battalion each
of infantry, mechanized infantry, and armor. 10
-
- The Regular Army also maintained three other brigades with special missions
in the early 1970s. The 172d and 193d Infantry Brigades served in Alaska
and the Canal Zone, respectively, as theater defense units. At Fort Knox,
Kentucky, the 194th Armored Brigade was a brigade in name only. It had been
reduced to a headquarters, and its infantry, armor, and field artillery
units had been assigned directly to the Armor School. The 194th, however,
remained at Fort Knox as a command and control organization for various
units ranging in size from a finance section to a supply and service battalion.11
-
- In late 1972 the Army approved the reorganization of the 101st Airborne
Division using new airmobile divisional tables. Since returning from Vietnam,
the 101st had comprised two airmobile brigades and one airborne brigade,
with the airborne brigade separately deployable. Defense planners had insisted
that the division serve as a quick reaction force until the thirteen-division
force was combat ready. The existing division employed a conglomeration
of old, new, and test tables of organization and equipment, which created
organizational problems in the division's combat and support units, particularly
in signal resources and medium-range field artillery. After extensive study
Army Chief of Staff Creighton Abrams approved the reorganization of the
division under new tables, which continued to provide two airmobile brigades
and one airborne brigade, with its supporting elements parachute qualified.
Signal, engineer, maintenance, and aviation resources were increased; and
an air defense artillery battalion, adjutant general and finance companies,
and a materiel management center added. A 155-mm. howitzer battalion, which
had been used in Vietnam by the division, was made an organic element in
the tables, but in fielding the new structure, Abrams directed that the
155-mm. towed howitzer battalion be temporarily eliminated as a way to reduce
personnel requirements.12
-
- By early 1974 the thirteen-division Regular Army force was deemed combat
ready, and contingency plans no longer required an airborne brigade in the
101st. United States Army Forces Command, which in part replaced the United
States Continental Army Command in 1973, reorganized the division as a completely
airmobile organization. The reorganization also eliminated internal rivalries
between the higher paid paratroopers (soldiers on "jump status")
and the regular airmobile soldiers. To compensate for its loss of airborne
status in recruiting, Maj. Gen. Sidney B. Berry, the commander of the 101st,
decided to capitalize on the division's air assault training, requesting
that the division's parenthetical designation be changed from "airmobile"
to "air assault" and that the personnel who completed air assault
training be authorized to wear a special badge. The Army Staff approved
the change in designation and eventually authorized the air assault badge.13
- [356]
- General Abrams
-
- The airborne division was the last type of division to be modernized.
As in other divisions, the new tables provided an air defense artillery
battalion, adjutant general and finance companies, and a materiel management
center. The structure also continued to include a much debated light armor
battalion, equipped with reconnaissance airborne assault vehicles, which
had been assigned to the division in 1969. The most significant change,
however, was the replacement of the supply company with a supply and service
battalion, which provided the division with over 500 additional service
personnel. The one remaining active airborne division, the 82d, with nine
airborne infantry battalions and an armor battalion, adopted the new structure
by the fall of 1974.14
-
- After returning from Vietnam the 1st Cavalry Division had been given two
primary missions: evaluate the interaction of armor, mechanized infantry,
airmobile infantry, and air cavalry (armed helicopters); and fill the role
of an armored division in the strategic reserve force. To cover the second
mission, the division continued to use National Guard round-out units, which
had originally been designated for the 1st Armored Division-the unit that
the 1st Cavalry Division replaced at Fort Hood in 1971. To evaluate the
interaction of armor, air cavalry, and mechanized and airmobile infantry,
the "First Team" was organized under new tables (Chart 42) that
included resources for an air cavalry combat brigade (ACCB). This was not
to be the type of brigade the Howze Board had suggested in 1962, which was
to be a completely air-fighting unit, but one that troops in Vietnam and
Europe had been testing under limited conditions as a combined arms assault
unit. With the division combining armor, infantry, and air cavalry in one
organization, Westmoreland coined the term "TRICAP" (triple capability)
to describe it.15
-
- During the evaluation of TRICAP two views emerged about the structure
of an air cavalry combat brigade. Some planners saw it primarily as a separate
antiarmor brigade with infantry and air cavalry integrated into attack helicopter
squadrons without organic support. Others desired the brigade to be a strong,
well-balanced, versatile organization with attack helicopter, infantry,
reconnaissance, artillery, and combat support units that could perform a
variety of missions, including an antitank role. During the summer of 1972
Vice Chief of Staff
- [357]
- TRICAP Division
-
-
-
- [358]
- Bruce Palmer noted that a brigade consisting of only attack helicopter squadrons
was an expensive organization. (The table for such a proposed squadron called
for 88 (45 attack, 27 observation, and 16 utility) helicopters. Therefore
he did not envision it as an independent strike force. Nevertheless, he directed
further development of an attack helicopter squadron because of concerns voiced
by General Michael S. Davison, the commander of U.S. Army, Europe, and Seventh
Army. In Europe Soviet armor forces greatly outnumbered their NATO counterparts,
and Davison needed some sort of long-range capability that could destroy,
disrupt, or at least delay enemy mechanized units behind the main battlefield.
Following the development of the squadron, Palmer believed that the planners
could sort out the matter of whether the brigade should be assigned to a division
or a corps. 16
-
- By the end of 1972 the course of the TRICAP/ACCB studies appeared set.
The Combat Developments Command recommended reorganizing the 1st Cavalry
Division to consist of two armored brigades (with two mechanized infantry
and four armor battalions divided between them) and one air cavalry combat
brigade. The latter, to be employed as a part of the division or independently,
was to consist of an airmobile infantry battalion and two attack helicopter
squadrons. The brigade was to have no organic support battalion. Round-out
battalions continued to be assigned to the 1st Cavalry Division so that
it could deploy as a full armored division along with the air cavalry combat
brigade. 17
-
- Before the ink dried on the new instructions, Abrams decided to reorganize
the air cavalry combat brigade as a separate unit for employment at corps
level and to make the division exclusively an armored unit. With one organic
brigade organized as air cavalry, the 1st Cavalry Division with only two
mechanized infantry and four armor battalions lacked the necessary ground-gaining
and holding ability of a normal armored division. On 21 February 1975 the
Army thus organized the 6th Cavalry Brigade (Air Combat) at Fort Hood, Texas.
The first of its type, the brigade consisted of a headquarters and headquarters
troop, an air cavalry squadron (without the armored cavalry troop), two
attack helicopter battalions, a support battalion, and a signal company.
Strictly an air unit, the brigade's mission was to locate, disrupt, and
destroy enemy armored and mechanized units by aerial combat power. In the
summer of that year the 1st Cavalry Division was reorganized wholly as an
armored division with four armor and four mechanized infantry battalions
in the Regular Army. One mechanized infantry and two armor battalions in
the National Guard continued to round out the division.18
-
- Although the 21-division, 21-brigade force did not alter the number of
reserve divisions and brigades, the reserve components underwent numerous
changes after the Army withdrew from Vietnam. Like the Regular Army, the
Guard began increasing its heavy forces in 1971 with the 32d (Wisconsin)
and 81st (Washington) Infantry Brigades being converted to mechanized infantry.
In 1972 the states began modernizing their divisions and brigades using
the recently published tables, but they lacked the materiel to complete
the process.
- [359]
-
- The Chaparral short-range air defense surface-to-air missile system;
below, the Vulcan air defense system.
-
-
- [360]
- To field air defense artillery battalions, Guard units used "Dusters,"
M42 tracked vehicles with dual-mounted 40-mm. antiaircraft guns, rather than
Chaparrals and Vulcans. As only limited numbers of M60 tanks, M551 assault
vehicles (Sheridans), and AH-1 helicopters (Cobras) were available, the Guard
continued to use vintage equipment.19
-
- Shortly after the National Guard reorganized its divisions, a controversy
arose over the command of the 30th Armored Division, a multistate unit supported
by Tennessee, Mississippi, and Alabama. Tennessee was about to appoint a
new divisional commander, and the governors of Mississippi and Alabama threatened
to withdraw their units from the division unless their officers had the
opportunity to be the divisional commander. Governor Winfield Dunn of Tennessee
objected to rotation of the commander's position, and Secretary of the Army
Robert F. Froehlke supported him. Abrams therefore directed Maj. Gen. Francis
S. Greenlief, Chief of the National Guard Bureau, to review such command
arrangements in all Guard divisions.20
-
- Before Greenlief could propose a solution, other events made the question
moot. The Department of Defense directed the Army to convert six reserve
brigades from infantry to armored or mechanized infantry as reinforcements
for Europe. In the meantime, Mississippi Governor William L. Waller decided
to withdraw his units from the 30th Armored Division. Given the requirement
to convert some brigades, the Army Staff decided to have Tennessee, Mississippi,
and Alabama each organize an armored brigade and to move the allotment of
the armored division to Texas, which could support the necessary units itself.
After much negotiating, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi agreed to organize
the 30th, 31st, and 155th Armored Brigades, and Texas took on the 49th Armored
Division in 1973. For the other three brigades, the Army replaced the 30th
Infantry Division, another tri-state division, with the 30th (North Carolina),
48th (Georgia), and 218th (Louisiana) Infantry Brigades and reorganized
the 40th Infantry Division in California. All were mechanized infantry.
The reorganization did not change the total number of reserve divisions
or brigades, and the National Guard continued to field 8 divisions (1 mechanized
infantry, 2 armored, and 5 standard infantry) and 18 brigades (3 armored,
6 mechanized infantry, and 9 standard infantry), while the Army Reserve
supported 3 brigades (I mechanized infantry and 2 infantry).21
-
- By 30 June 1974, the Army had attained the 21-division, 21-brigade force
(Tables 32 and 33). The 25th Infantry Division at Schofield Barracks,
with two brigades, and the 197th Infantry Brigade at Fort Benning were regarded
as equivalent to one division in the Regular Army. Some Regular Army divisions
in the continental United States, however, had round-out battalions from
the reserves to meet mobilization missions. More serious was the fact that
reserve divisions and brigades continued to experience readiness problems.
Recruitment lagged because of the end of the draft, and equipment shortages
continued due to the lack of money. The "total force" thus exhibited
significant weaknesses.22
- [361]
- The 21-Division Force, June 1974
-
Division |
Component |
Location of Headquarters |
Maneuver Battalions |
Inf |
Mech |
Ar |
Abn |
AAST |
1st Armored |
RA |
Ansbach, Germany |
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
1st Cavalry 1&3 |
RA |
Fort Hood, Tex |
|
2 |
4 |
|
|
1st Infantry2 |
RA |
Fort Riley, Kans. |
|
5 |
5 |
|
|
2d Armored3 |
RA |
Fort Hood, Tex. |
|
4 |
4 |
|
|
2d Infantry |
RA |
Camp Casey, Korea |
4 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
3d Armored |
RA |
Frankfurt, Germany |
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
3d Infantry |
RA |
Wuerzburg, Germany |
|
6 |
5 |
|
|
4th Infantry |
RA |
Fort Carson, Colo. |
|
6 |
4 |
|
|
8th Infantry |
RA |
Bad Kreuznach, Germany |
|
6 |
5 |
|
|
9th Infantry |
RA |
Fort Lewis, Wash. |
7 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
25th Infantry3 |
RA |
Schofield Barracks, Hawaii |
6 |
|
|
|
|
26th Infantry |
NG |
Boston, Mass. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
28th Infantry |
NG |
Harrisburg, Pa. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
38th Infantry |
NG |
Indianapolis, Ind. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
40th Infantry |
NG |
California |
|
6 |
4 |
|
|
42d Infantry |
NG |
New York, N.Y. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
47th Infantry |
NG |
St. Paul, Mich. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
49th Armored |
NG |
Austin, Tex. |
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
50th Armored |
NG |
East Orange, N.J. |
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
82d Airborne |
RA |
Fort Bragg, N.C. |
|
|
1 |
9 |
|
101st Airborne |
RA |
Fort Campbell, Ky. |
|
|
|
|
9 |
-
- 1 Does not include the 6th Cavalry Brigade units.
- 2 One brigade deployed forward in Germany.
- 3 Less round-out unit or units assigned.
- [362]
- The 21-Brigade Force, June 1974
-
Brigade |
Location of Component |
Headquarters |
Maneuver Battalions |
1nf |
Mech |
Ar |
Lt Inf |
29th Infantry |
NG and AR |
Honolulu, Hawaii |
|
2 |
|
|
30th Armored |
NG |
Jackson, Tenn. |
|
1 |
2 |
|
30th Infantry (M)1 |
NG |
Clinton, N.C. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
31st Armored |
NG |
Tuscaloosa, Ala. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
32d Infantry (M)1 |
NG |
Milwaukee, Wisc. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
33d Infantry |
NG |
Chicago, Ill. |
3 |
|
|
|
39th Infantry |
NG |
Little Rock, Ark. |
3 |
|
|
|
41st Infantry |
NG |
Portland, Oreg. |
3 |
|
|
|
45th Infantry |
NG |
Edmond, Okla. |
3 |
|
|
|
48th Infantry (M)1 |
NG |
Macon, Ga. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
53d Infantry |
NG |
Tampa, Fla. |
3 |
|
|
|
67th Infantry (M)1 |
NG |
Lincoln, Neb. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
69th Infantry |
NG |
Topeka, Kans. |
3 |
|
|
|
81st Infantry (M)1 |
NG |
Seattle, Wash. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
92d Infantry |
NG |
San Juan, Puerto Rico |
3 |
|
|
|
155th Armored |
NG |
Tupelo, Miss. |
|
1 |
2 |
|
157th Infantry (M)1 |
AR |
Horsham, Pa. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
172d Infantry2 |
RA |
Fort Richardson, Alaska |
|
|
|
3 |
187th Infantry |
AR |
Wollaston, Mass. |
3 |
|
|
|
193d Infantry2 |
RA |
Fort Kobbe, Canal Zone |
2 |
1 |
|
|
194th Armored |
RA |
Fort Knox, Ky. |
No assigned battalions |
197th Infantry3 |
RA |
Fort Benning, Ga. |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
205th Infantry |
AR |
Fort Snelling, Minn. |
3 |
|
|
|
218th Infantry (M)1 |
NG |
Newberry, S.C. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
256th Infantry |
NG |
Lafayette, La. |
3 |
|
|
|
-
- 1 Mechanized unit.
- 2 Special mission brigade.
- 3 The brigade and the 25th Infantry Division with two active brigades counted
as a divisional equivalent.
- [363]
-
- As the Army struggled to meet the 21-division, 21-brigade force, General
Abrams turned his attention to the nation's ability to execute its military
strategy without resorting to nuclear weapons and to the task of providing
the resources needed to deal with a variety of world situations. In testimony
before congressional committees in 1974, he characterized the Regular Army's
portion of the 21-division force as a high-risk, "no room for error"
force.23
He further testified that through more efficient management, cuts
in nonessential support activities, and reorganization of various headquarters
throughout the Army, a 785,000-man Regular Army could support sixteen divisions.
Congress gave no opposition, and the Department of Defense lent its support.
Therefore, Abrams directed his staff to plan for three additional Regular
Army divisions by 1980.24
-
- Although some officers on Abrams' staff were thunderstruck at the directive,
since a 785,000-man force had not been sufficient in the past to maintain
16 Regular Army divisions, the Army Staff eventually developed plans involving
both regulars and reserves to raise a 24-division force. A mechanized infantry
division and two infantry divisions were to be phased into the force over
the next few years. The first increment was to include activating three
new divisional brigades, reorganizing the 1st Cavalry Division as an armored
division (as decided earlier), and adjusting the number of maneuver elements
in other divisions in the United States. Phase two was to provide the base
and an additional brigade for each of the three new divisions. Phase three
was vague, but the divisions were to be completed using reserve round-out
units.25
-
- During the summer of 1974 Forces Command began to implement the 24-division
force. To provide some of the resources, various headquarters throughout
the Army were reorganized, cuts were made in nonessential support activities,
and the 1st and 4th Infantry Divisions each saw one of their Regular Army
maneuver battalions inactivated and replaced by a National Guard round-out
unit. On 21 October the command activated the 7th Infantry Division headquarters
and the 1st Brigades of the 5th, 7th, and 24th Infantry Divisions at Forts
Polk, Ord, and Stewart, respectively. The 7th and 24th were standard, or
"foot," infantry divisions, and the 5th was mechanized infantry.
Because Fort Polk, in Louisiana, lacked adequate housing facilities, the
brigade of the 5th fielded only two maneuver battalions. The larger facilities
at Fort Ord, California, allowed the 7th to support four maneuver battalions,
and the brigade of the 24th at Fort Stewart, Georgia, fielded three. As
noted above, Forces Command organized the 6th Cavalry Brigade (Air Combat)
as a separate corps-level aviation unit and reorganized the 1st Cavalry
Division as an armored division consisting of four armor and four mechanized
infantry battalions in the Regular Army and three round-out battalions from
the National Guard.26
-
- Phase two of the program required organizing the base and a second brigade
for each division. For the 5th and 24th Infantry Divisions elements of the
194th Armored Brigade and the 197th Infantry Brigade were to be used, but
all ele-
- [364]
- Round-out Units, 1978
-
Division |
Unit |
Component |
1st Cavalry |
2d Battalion, 120th Infantry |
N.C. NG |
|
2d Battalion, 252d Armor |
N.C. NG |
|
1st Battalion, 263d Armor |
S.C. NG |
1st Infantry |
2d Battalion, 136th Infantry |
Minn. NG |
2d Armored |
3d Battalion, 149th Infantry |
Ky. NG |
|
1st Battalion, 123d Armor |
Ky. NG |
|
2d Battalion, 123d Armor |
Ky. NG |
4th Infantry |
1st Battalion, 1 17th Infantry |
Tenn. NG |
5th Infantry |
256th Infantry Brigade |
La. NG |
7th Infantry |
41st Infantry Brigade |
Wash. NG |
|
8th Battalion, 40th Armor |
Army Reserve |
9th Infantry |
1st Battalion, 803d Armor |
Wash. NG |
24th Infantry |
48th Infantry Brigade |
Ga. NG |
25th Infantry |
29th Infantry Brigade |
Hawaii NG and Army Reserve |
-
- ments of the second brigade in the 7th Infantry Division were to be newly
organized. On 28 August 1975, however, the Army canceled the plans to use
the 194th Armored and 197th Infantry Brigades because of congressional pressure
to improve the ratio of combat to support troops. All units in phase two
were to be formed new in the Regular Army.27
-
- Forces Command began activating phase two units in the fall of 1975, organizing
all required Regular Army units within two years. While the Regular Army
units were being activated, Louisiana, Washington, and Georgia agreed that
the 256th, 41st, and 48th Infantry Brigades would be assigned to round out
the 5th, 7th, and 24th Infantry Divisions, respectively. Because the 7th
needed an armor battalion, the 8th Battalion, 40th Armor, an Army Reserve
unit, was assigned to it. Hence, in order to raise the 24-division force,
the round-out concept was extended to all divisions except those forward
deployed in Germany and Korea and the airborne and airmobile units (Table
34). 28
-
- Although Forces Command did not use the 194th Armored and 197th Infantry
Brigades to organize the new divisions, both brigades were assigned strategic
missions after 21 October 1975. Responding to General Abrams' congressional
testimony to provide a better balance of combat to support units, the Army
Staff converted 4,000 general support spaces to combat positions in the
continental United States, and the command used some of them to reorganize
the 194th as a strategic reserve unit. The brigade eventually included one
mechanized infantry battalion and two tank battalions. In addition, it continued
to support the Armor School at Fort Knox. 29
- [365]
- In 1974 congressional dissatisfaction led Senator Sam Nunn of Georgia to
sponsor an amendment requiring the Army to reduce the number of support forces
in Europe by 18,000 officers and enlisted personnel but permitting those spaces
to be used to organize combat units there. The new units could include battalions
or smaller units of infantry, armor, field and air defense artillery, cavalry,
engineers, special forces, and aviation, which were to improve the visibility
of the nation's combat power in Europe.30
-
- To execute the Nunn amendment US. Army Forces Command and U.S. Army, Europe,
and Seventh Army agreed to a plan for organizing a mechanized infantry brigade
and an armored brigade for Europe, which were known as Brigade-75 and Brigade-76.
Under the plan the headquarters and a support battalion for each brigade
were to be stationed in Germany while the infantry, armor, and field artillery
battalions, engineer companies, and cavalry troops from the United States
were to rotate every six months. No provisions were made for dependents
to accompany the soldiers since they were to be away from home on temporary
duty for only 179 days. The short duration of the assignment was to be a
cost-saving measure, which indirectly also attacked the balance of payment
problem between the United States and its allies, and a morale booster.
To support the rotation of Brigade-75, the first unit in the program, the
Army selected the 2d Armored Division, at Fort Hood, Texas. Between March
and June 1975 the 3d Brigade, 2d Armored Division, deployed to Germany,
with its headquarters at Grafenwoehr and its elements scattered at various
training areas. A few weeks before each unit departed Fort Hood, Forces
Command activated a similar unit, including Headquarters and Headquarters
Company, 4th Brigade, 2d Armored Division, to maintain the three-brigade
structure of the division in the continental United States. During the deployment
the Army Staff approved a request from Forces Command to use a battalion
from the 1st Cavalry Division, rather than have all elements from the 2d
Armored Division, in order to reduce personnel turbulence in the 2d. Because
of the shortage of tank crews, the Army changed Brigade-75 from an armored
to a mechanized infantry unit. Another factor in the decision to deploy
a mechanized brigade was the shortage of tanks resulting from U.S. replacement
of tanks the Israelis had lost in their 1973 war against the Arabs. In September
1975 the first rotation of brigade elements between Germany and Fort Hood
began.31
-
- Forces Command selected the 4th Infantry Division to support Brigade-76
and in December 1975 activated the 4th Brigade, 4th Infantry Division, at
Fort Carson, Colorado. The following year the brigade moved to Germany.
To lighten the burden of the 4th Infantry Division at Fort Carson, a mechanized
infantry battalion from the 1st Infantry Division at Fort Riley was included
in the rotation scheme. Following the procedure used to send Brigade-75
to Europe, new organizations were activated in the 1st and 4th Infantry
Divisions to maintain their divisional integrity.32
-
- As elements of the 3d Brigade, 2d Armored Division, and the 4th Brigade,
4th Infantry Division, rotated, the Army monitored the effect on the budget,
readiness,
- [366]
- and morale. Evidence soon suggested that the rotation of the brigades improved
neither cost effectiveness nor readiness. Therefore, the Army decided that
the brigades would be assigned permanently to US. Army, Europe, and Seventh
Army. The reassignment of the 4th Brigade, 4th Infantry Division, took place
in the fall of 1976. At that time the 3d Battalion, 28th Infantry, the element
of the 1st Infantry Division supporting the brigade, was reassigned to the
4th Infantry Division. To improve the alignment of Allied forces in Europe,
Army leaders decided to station Brigade-75 (the 3d Brigade, 2d Armored Division)
in northern Germany, where no American combat unit had served since the end
of World War 11. Such problems as the lack of housing, particularly for dependents,
and opposition from German nationals over the impact of the troops on the
environment, caused the elements of the brigade to continue to rotate until
the questions could be resolved. Two years later, after building a new military
complex at Garlstedt, the 3d Brigade, 2d Armored Division, became a permanent
part of the European forces. At Fort Hood the 4th Brigade, 2d Armored Division,
and the battalion of the 1st Cavalry Division that supported the brigade were
inactivated. A new battalion was assigned to the 2d Armored Division from
its traditional regiments to replace the 1st Cavalry Division unit inactivated
in Germany. The net result of the Nunn amendment on divisional forces was
two more brigades forward deployed in Germany but a reduction of one brigade
in the 2d Armored Division in the United States.33
-
- Readiness became the watchword for the seventies. Although some Army leaders
believed that the first battle of any future war might be the last and final
ground battle, a high state of readiness served as a deterrent against aggression.
Improving readiness in the Army's 24-division force thus became the primary
objective of Army Chief of Staff Fred C. Weyand, who was appointed after
Abrams died in office in September 1974. Weyand requested the National Guard
Bureau to explore the consolidation of the 50th Armored and the 26th, 28th,
38th, 42d, and 47th Infantry Divisions into single or bi-state configurations
and to consider the possibility of forming five more brigades. The latter
were to be organized only with the secretary of defense's approval. In 1975
and 1976 the 50th Armored Division was reorganized in New Jersey and Vermont,
the 28th Infantry Division in Pennsylvania, and the 42d Infantry Division
in New York. Former elements of the 28th from Maryland and Virginia supported
the new 58th and 116th Infantry Brigades, respectively. In 1977 Ohio dropped
out of the 38th Infantry Division, leaving Indiana and Michigan to maintain
it. Ohio organized the 73d Infantry Brigade. The only divisional element
not concentrated within each division's new recruiting area was the air
defense artillery battalions. With these changes, the Army reached the 24-division,
24-brigade force (Tables 35 and 36). Also, the 36th Airborne Brigade
and 149th Armored Brigade headquarters were organized and federally recognized
in the National Guard, but they were headquarters only, without assigned
elements.34
-
- The Army Reserve continued to maintain three brigades within the total
force. These brigades were the least combat ready units in the Army. Without
the draft, the
- [367]
- The 24-Division Force, 1978
-
-
Division |
Component |
Locationof Headquarters |
Maneuver Battalions |
Inf |
Mech |
Ar |
Abn |
AAst |
Remarks |
1st Armored |
RA |
Ansbach, Germany |
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
1st Cavalry1 |
RA |
Fort Hood, Tex. |
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
See Table 34 |
1st Infantry2 |
RA |
Fort Riley, Kans. |
|
5 |
4 |
|
|
See Table 34 |
2d Armored3 |
RA |
Fort Hood, Tex. |
|
6 |
5 |
|
|
See Table 34 |
2d Infantry |
RA |
Camp Casey, Korea |
4 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
3d Armored |
RA |
Frankfurt, Germany |
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
3d Infantry |
RA |
Wuerzburg, Germany |
|
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
4th Infantry4 |
RA |
Fort Carson, Colo. |
|
7 |
5 |
|
|
See Table 34 |
5th Infantry (-) |
RA |
Fort Polk, La. |
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
See Table 34 |
7th Infantry (-) |
RA |
Fort Ord, Calif |
6 |
|
|
|
|
See Table 34 |
8th Infantry |
RA |
Bad Kreuznach, Germany |
|
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
9th Infantry (-) |
RA |
Fort Lewis, Wash. |
|
7 |
1 |
l |
|
See Table 34 |
24th Infantry (-) |
RA |
Fort Stewart, Ga. |
|
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
25th Infantry (-) |
RA |
Schofield Barracks, Hawaii |
6 |
|
|
|
|
See Table 34 |
26th Infantry |
NG |
Boston, Mass. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
28th Infantry |
NG |
Harrisburg, Pa. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
38th Infantry |
NG |
Indianapolis, Ind. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
40th Infantry |
NG |
Long Beach, Calif. |
|
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
42nd Infantry |
NG |
New York, N.Y. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
47th Infantry |
NG |
St. Paul, Mich. |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
49th Armored |
NG |
Austin, Tex. |
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
50th Armored |
NG |
Somerset, N.J. |
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
82d Airborne |
RA |
Fort Bragg, N.C. |
|
|
1 |
9 |
|
|
101st Airborne |
RA |
Fort Campbell, Ky. |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
-
- 1 One battalion supported the 3d Brigade, 2d Armored Division (Brigade-75).
- 2 The 1st Infantry Division Forward was in Germany.
- 3 Supported 3d Brigade, 2d Armored Division (Brigade-75) in Germany.
- 4 Supported 4th Brigade, 4th Infantry Division (Brigade-76) in Germany.
-
- [368]
- The 24-Brigade Force, 1978
-
Brigade |
Component |
Locationof Headquarters |
Maneuver Battalions |
Inf |
Mech |
Ar |
Lt lnf |
Remarks |
29th Infantry (RO) |
NG & AR |
Honolulu, Hawaii |
3 |
|
|
|
|
30th Armored |
NG |
Jackson, Tenn. |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
30th Infantry |
NG |
Clinton, S.C. |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
31st Armored |
NG |
Northport, Ala. |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
32d Infantry (M) |
NG |
Milwaukee, Wisc. |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
33d Infantry |
NG |
Chicago, Ill. |
3 |
|
|
|
|
36th Airborne |
NG |
Houston, Tex. |
No assigned battalions |
39th Infantry |
NG |
Little Rock, Ark. |
3 |
|
|
|
|
41st Infantry (RO) |
NG |
Portland, Oreg. |
3 |
|
|
|
|
45th Infantry |
NG |
Edmond, Okla. |
3 |
|
|
|
|
48th Infantry (M) (RO) |
NG |
Macon, Ga. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
53d Infantry |
NG |
Tampa, Fla. |
3 |
|
|
|
|
58th Infantry |
NG |
Pikesville, Md. |
3 |
|
|
|
|
67th Infantry (M) |
NG |
Lincoln, Neb. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
69th Infantry |
NG |
Topeka, Kans. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
73d Infantry |
NG |
Columbus, Ohio |
3 |
|
|
|
|
81st Infantry (M) |
NG |
Seattle, Wash. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
92d Infantry |
NG |
San Juan, Puerto Rico |
4 |
|
|
|
|
116th Infantry |
NG |
Staunton, Va. |
3 |
|
|
|
|
149th Armored |
NG |
Bowling Green, Ky. |
No assigned battalions |
155th Armored |
NG |
Tupelo, Miss. |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
157th Infantry (M) |
AR |
Horsham, Pa. |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
172d Infantry |
RA |
Fort Richardson, Alaska |
l |
1 |
1 |
|
Special Mission |
187th Infantry |
AR |
Fort Devens, Mass. |
3 |
|
|
|
|
193d Infantry |
RA |
Fort Kobbe, Canal Zone |
|
2 |
1 |
|
Special Mission |
194th Armored |
RA |
Fort Knox, Ky. |
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
197th Infantry |
RA |
Fort Benning, Ga. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
205th Infantry |
AR |
Fort Snelling, Minn. |
|
|
|
3 |
|
218th Infantry (M) |
NG |
Newberry, S.C. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
256th Infantry (RO) |
NG |
Lafayette, La. |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
-
- [369]
- reserves continued to suffer major recruiting problems. When planning for
the three new Regular Army divisions, some Army Staff members and Secretary
of the Army Howard Callaway had wanted to use an Army Reserve infantry brigade
as a round-out unit, but none of the component's brigades met the required
manning and equipment levels. As an alternative the staff considered moving
either the 157th or the 187th Infantry Brigade, or both, to the southern part
of the United States and shifting the 205th Infantry Brigade to the West Coast,
all areas where recruiting was thought to be better. But congressional opposition
stopped these proposals, and the units remained generally in their existing
areas.35
-
- Despite these difficulties, Forces Command wished to improve the readiness
of the Army Reserve brigades. At first it proposed reducing the number of
units, particularly in the northeast, the First U.S. Army's area, and in
February 1975 it inactivated a battalion in the 157th Infantry Brigade at
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Then, early in 1976, Maj. Gen. Henry Mohr, Chief
of the Army Reserve, submitted a brigade improvement plan that retained
the units in their recruiting areas but eliminated other units from the
areas to limit the competition for scarce personnel resources. As the Army
Reserve staff developed the plan, Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and
Plans (DCSOPS) Lt. Gen. Donald H. Cowles selected the 41st Infantry Brigade,
the only brigade with a northern Arctic mission, as the round-out unit for
the 7th Infantry Division. To replace the brigade in the contingency plans,
Mohr agreed to reorganize the 205th Infantry Brigade as a light unit. The
brigade assumed responsibility for the contingency mission on 4 July 1976.36
-
- As the Army National Guard and Army Reserve shouldered a more active role
in the Total Army's deterrence plans, the Army Staff developed a plan in
the mid-1970s to upgrade the effectiveness of brigade- and battalion-size
units. Known as the Affiliation Program, the initiative had three goals:
improving readiness; establishing a formal relationship between regular
and reserve units; and developing a system of priorities for manpower, equipment,
training, funding, and administrative resources. Within the program five
categories of combined arms brigades existed: round-out units, which gave
Regular Army divisions their full organizational structure; augmentation
units, which increased the combat potential of standard divisions; worldwide
deployable units, which needed assistance to meet deployment schedules;
special mission units, which served as theater defense forces; and units
to support the Army school system. Thus, each brigade in the reserves was
to have a mission and train for it in a "come-as-you-are for war"
mode, which was a far cry from mobilization planning that had existed before
and after World War II.37
-
- In 1970 the Army had revised the tables of organization for the administrative
training division so that it could function more effectively in reserve
status. The division consisted of a division base, a headquarters and headquarters
company, a leadership academy, and a support battalion; a committee group;
and four brigades-two brigades for basic training, one for advanced individual
training, and one for combat support training (Chart 43). Basic combat training
brigades
- [370]
- Training Division, 1970
-
-
- 1 Includes the band.
- 2 Structure of the Advanced Individual Training brigade varied depending
upon the type of training (infantry, armor, reconnaissance, field artillery,
or engineer) offered.
-
- [371]
- and the committee group underwent little change, but significant modifications
were made in both advanced individual training and combat support training
brigades. The composition of the advanced individual training brigade varied
with the type of training (infantry, armor, reconnaissance, artillery, or
engineer) offered, and the combat support training brigade was reorganized
to consist of administrative, food service/supply, automotive, and communications
battalions. Upon mobilization the division could train between 12,500 and
14,000 enlisted personnel, depending upon the type of training provided by
each brigade. All thirteen training divisions had adopted the tables by the
end of 1971.38
-
- Two years later, seeking again to improve readiness of the Army Reserve
units, Forces Command inactivated some training division elements. Advanced
individual training brigades in the 76th, 78th, 80th, 85th, and 91st Divisions
and the combat support training brigades in the 89th and 100th Divisions
were inactivated and the spaces used to organize "mini" maneuver
area commands. The new commands planned, prepared, conducted, and controlled
company and battalion exercises for the reserves.39
-
- As in other reserve units, recruiting difficulties caused undermanning
in some training units. In 1975 Forces Command inactivated the 89th Division.
The personnel formerly assigned to it were used to strengthen other Army
Reserve units and to organize the 5th Brigade (Training), an armor training
unit with headquarters at Lincoln, Nebraska, that consisted of one squadron
and two battalions. With the saving in personnel, a nondivisional Army Reserve
combat unit, the 3d Battalion, 87th Infantry, was organized at Fort Carson,
Colorado, to support the 193d Infantry Brigade in the Canal Zone.40
-
- The Army Reserve's 5th Brigade (Training) and the training divisions were
reorganized once again in late 1978. To save both time and money in training,
the active Army had earlier adopted the One Station Unit Training (OSUT)
program, under which recruits received both basic and advanced individual
training at the professional home of their arm or service. The program proved
successful, and Forces Command adopted it for the Army Reserve training
divisions. In addition, the revised structure allowed divisions to be tailored
for specific mobilization stations. To reflect these changes, the Department
of the Army published new tables of organization, which retained as the
division base a leadership academy and a support battalion but broke the
brigades and battalions down into cells that fitted together to meet specific
training requirements. Divisional training brigades no longer conducted
basic combat or advanced individual training but carried out both, the same
as in the Regular Army. The former divisional committee group and the committee
group from the combat support brigade evolved into a training command.41
-
- By October 1978 the Army was fielding the 24-division, 24-brigade force
that Abrams had envisaged five years earlier. But organizational developments
had been eclipsed by even deeper changes in the fabric of the Army. Prior
to its
- [372]
- withdrawal from Vietnam, the Nixon administration had adopted an all-volunteer
force and imposed cuts in money and personnel. To make up for these losses,
Army leaders drew the Regular Army and reserve components closer together,
first through the round-out and then though the affiliation programs. The
Army could no longer enjoy the luxury of general-purpose forces. Every division
and brigade was either forward deployed or assigned a specific mission within
the current contingency and mobilization plans. The Regular Army's special
mission combined arms brigades included the 193d Infantry Brigade in the
Canal Zone and the 172d Infantry Brigade in Alaska. The 194th Armored and
197th Infantry Brigades served both as Strategic Army Force units and as
support troops for the Infantry School at Fort Benning, Georgia, and the
Armor School at Fort Knox, Kentucky, in the training base. Changes in the
Total Army since the withdrawal from Vietnam stressed combat units at the
expense of support units. The nation did not have the resources for both.
- [373]
Endnotes
Previous Chapter
Next Chapter
page created 29 June 2001
Return to the
Table of Contents
-